Skip to content
SafetyWatch
  • Home
  • About
  • Team
  • Articles
  • Expert Contributors
  • Latest News
  • Contact Us

LA Court Declares Second Mistrial in a Negligence Lawsuit Against Rosana Levine, 2 Others

SafetyWatch > News > California > Los Angeles > LA Court Declares Second Mistrial in a Negligence Lawsuit Against Rosana Levine, 2 Others
  • Arizona
  • California
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Massachusetts
  • Nevada
  • Texas
  • Washington State
  • Written By Annie Ianko
  • Last modified: March 18, 2020

For the second time this year, the Los Angeles Superior Court declared a mistrial in an injury lawsuit filed by a Malibu woman in 2015 after she was hit by an alleged impaired driver while riding as a passenger on a motorcycle along Malibu Canyon Road, in Malibu, California. An LA judge, William MacLaughlin, made the pronouncement on Monday, March 16, following a jury summon.

The case was tabled before a Los Angeles Court about five years ago, after the traffic accident. The Plaintiff, 58-year-old Rosana Levine, was on a motorcycle with a male rider, Frank Ross Samuels, when the Defendant, Tia Jeri Hoberman, joined the Malibu Canyon Road from Harbour Vista Drive.

Have you or a loved one been involved in an accident? Speak to a lawyer for a free no obligation consultation

Get a Free Case Review

Or call us at (888) 699-7975

Who Am I Calling?

Calling this number connects you with one of SafetyWatch's trusted legal partners. A law firm representative will review your case for free.

SafetyWatch's sponsors support the organization’s mission to keep people safe from dangerous drugs and medical devices. For more information, visit our sponsors page.

(888) 699-7975

Hoberman allegedly failed to yield the right of way as she made a left turn at the intersection. She struck the motorcycle as a result, and knocked down its occupants, causing them major injuries.

The female victim sustained multiple injuries to her leg and ankle, which required several rounds of surgeries. Post recovery, the injured woman was unable to work in her previous capacity, according to court documents.

In addition to her claims of lost faculties, Rosana alleged that Hoberman’s view was obstructed by an Edison light pole, positioned inappropriately, coupled with Malibu City’s carelessly designed intersection.

However, lawyers representing Southern California Edison and the City of Malibu asserted that the driver was distracted by her cell phone prior to the crash.

The plaintiff sued the motorist, Malibu City, and Edison for the near-deadly crash, while Samuels settled for an off-the-court settlement in 2018.

This content is informational only and is not legal advice. Please seek the advice of an attorney about your case.

Share This

Did You Find Safetywatch Helpful?

How helpful was this page?

How can we improve this page?

Written by Annie Ianko

Annie Ianko has been working as a TV news journalist and editor, Associated Press journalist for 10 years. For the past 10 years, she has been managing the content creation process for several Fortune 50 companies and for a wide variety of legal firms.

Review Your Case

We value your privacy. By submitting, you agree to our privacy policy and disclaimer. After submitting, you will be contacted by one of SafetyWatch’s trusted legal partners. This is legal advertising.

Post navigation

Previous Post Previous post:
Police Name Hilton James as Motorist Who Died in North County Car Crash
Next Post Next post:
Nicanor Carlos Garcia and Jamie Rodrigue Hit and Kill Bicyclist in Madera Accident

Leave a comment

Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CONSULT AN ATTORNEY FOR FREE

FREE LEGAL CONSULTATION

If you have been injured in an accident that was not your fault, you may be owed compensation. Consult with a personal injury lawyer here.
Consult a Lawyer

About SafetyWatch

Dedicated writers and contributing experts covering the latest in all-things-related to accidents, consumer safety and advocacy through comprehensive research and analysis.

Contact Us

We value your privacy. By submitting, you agree to our privacy policy and disclaimer. After submitting, you will be contacted by one of SafetyWatch’s trusted legal partners. This is legal advertising.
SafetyWatch

Our Privacy Policy / Disclaimer

The information on this website is proprietary and protected. It is not a substitute for professional legal or medical advice. Any unauthorized or illegal use, copying or dissemination will be prosecuted. Please read our privacy policy and disclaimer for more information about our website. www.safetywatch.com is sponsored by law firm & This website and its content may be deemed attorney advertising Prior results do not predict a similar outcome For more information, visit our sponsors’ page.